Density – ‘that’ 7 letter word

D*%$!#?

(Density)

It was interesting reading Michael Janda from ABC’s The Drum post his thoughts about the lack of density in Australian cities compared to cities elsewhere in the world, but I wonder who is reading and listening… observing from the comments at least a few – as always with diametrically opposed views.  Kudos to Michael for presenting some interesting facts about the potential benefits of the ‘D’ word… however it does involve a different style of living that many of us may be less accustomed to.

I mentioned in a recent post the potential impact of not considering alternative development models would have on Perth by the middle of this century – i.e. continued urban sprawl.  I don’t think that will happen (well I hope it won’t!) however we need to find some suitable middle ground to start the ball rolling to showcase how this can be done right.

To add to my thoughts on this I recently spent several days in Singapore (the source of the photos on this post) and it is a shining light for higher density developments with mixed uses that appears to work very well.  I accept that it does give a different feel to the city; however there are a large number of parks and amenities that are readily accessible.  I think we need to start looking at other cities and learning from them (rather than keeping on sprawling out like L.A.).

So what do we do with our ‘Density Challenge’?  Any of you have any ideas?

Tom

Advertisements
This entry was posted in General, State Planning and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Density – ‘that’ 7 letter word

  1. RobF says:

    Tom, yes we definitely need higher density to avoid urban sprawn. Have a look at Richard Wellers book Boomtown 2050 for lots of ideas!

    But your point about public spaces is an important one: great places to live always provide great places for people to be when not at home or work. There are flaws in our planning process which seem to concentrate on the built environment, rather than the people environment. Singapore is indeed a great place, with lots of people-centric planning.

    Have a look at “projects for public places” (?) at http://www.pps.org

    Rob

  2. Pingback: Times are Changing or are they? | My Future State

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s